<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Bysiewicz Pay the Fare?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyructions.com/did-bysiewicz-pay-the-fare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyructions.com/did-bysiewicz-pay-the-fare/</link>
	<description>Kevin Rennie&#039;s ructions and other disturbances</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:56:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyructions.com/did-bysiewicz-pay-the-fare/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyructions.com/?p=49#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Since Judicial characterizes attorneys as &quot;active. &quot; &quot;inactive, &quot; &quot;retired,&quot; etc. we might use that as the test.  If so, she qualifies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Judicial characterizes attorneys as &#8220;active. &#8221; &#8220;inactive, &#8221; &#8220;retired,&#8221; etc. we might use that as the test.  If so, she qualifies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Did Bysiewicz Pay the Fare? — Daily Ructions -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyructions.com/did-bysiewicz-pay-the-fare/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Did Bysiewicz Pay the Fare? — Daily Ructions -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyructions.com/?p=49#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ryan McKeen and Ryan McKeen, Matthew Curtiss. Matthew Curtiss said: RT @ryanmckeen: An interesting update from Kevin Rennie on the Bysiewicz situation: http://tinyurl.com/yccm8cj [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ryan McKeen and Ryan McKeen, Matthew Curtiss. Matthew Curtiss said: RT @ryanmckeen: An interesting update from Kevin Rennie on the Bysiewicz situation: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yccm8cj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yccm8cj</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndersonScooper</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyructions.com/did-bysiewicz-pay-the-fare/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>AndersonScooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyructions.com/?p=49#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Pathetic Kevin. Really pathetic.

Ms. Bysiewicz has been a member of the CT Bar since 1986, and is obviously qualified to be Attorney General.

Why don&#039;t you and Healy find an actual Republican candidate, and then perhaps we could have a genuine discussion, on the issues that matter to Connecticut voters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic Kevin. Really pathetic.</p>
<p>Ms. Bysiewicz has been a member of the CT Bar since 1986, and is obviously qualified to be Attorney General.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you and Healy find an actual Republican candidate, and then perhaps we could have a genuine discussion, on the issues that matter to Connecticut voters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Mainor</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyructions.com/did-bysiewicz-pay-the-fare/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Mainor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyructions.com/?p=49#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I had believed that any Connecticut elector who had passed the bar to practice law at least 10 years ago was eligible to run for Attorney General.  Given the law, I suppose Secretary Bysiewicz may not qualify.  We should give her a chance to state her argument.  If she does not qualify, I hope that she would have the opportunity to run for Governor or, if not, the opportunity to run for reelection to Secretary of the State.  She obviously believed that she qualified to run for Attorney General and it was a reasonable assumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had believed that any Connecticut elector who had passed the bar to practice law at least 10 years ago was eligible to run for Attorney General.  Given the law, I suppose Secretary Bysiewicz may not qualify.  We should give her a chance to state her argument.  If she does not qualify, I hope that she would have the opportunity to run for Governor or, if not, the opportunity to run for reelection to Secretary of the State.  She obviously believed that she qualified to run for Attorney General and it was a reasonable assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara J. Ruhe</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyructions.com/did-bysiewicz-pay-the-fare/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara J. Ruhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyructions.com/?p=49#comment-25</guid>
		<description>We need a real lawyer for this job not some political hack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a real lawyer for this job not some political hack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

