Comments on: Round up Julia Tashjian and Miles Rapoport. http://www.dailyructions.com/round-up-julia-tashjian-and-miles-rapoport/ Kevin Rennie's ructions and other disturbances Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:56:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ryan McKeen http://www.dailyructions.com/round-up-julia-tashjian-and-miles-rapoport/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Ryan McKeen Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:09:36 +0000 http://www.dailyructions.com/?p=56#comment-44 At this point she should be receiving first rate legal advice from someone. That person or those persons must be telling her that her argument is weak because it is. I wonder how far she pushes it? If she gets hit with an injunction and loses then she's done forever. If she comes out and says this "win or lose" this issue presents too much of distraction and announces her candidacy for SOS - she may live to fight another day because come November this will be long for gotten. Taking this to court is the equivalent of putting one's life savings on the green square at a roulette table. At this point she should be receiving first rate legal advice from someone. That person or those persons must be telling her that her argument is weak because it is. I wonder how far she pushes it? If she gets hit with an injunction and loses then she’s done forever. If she comes out and says this “win or lose” this issue presents too much of distraction and announces her candidacy for SOS – she may live to fight another day because come November this will be long for gotten. Taking this to court is the equivalent of putting one’s life savings on the green square at a roulette table.

]]> By: CT Lawyer http://www.dailyructions.com/round-up-julia-tashjian-and-miles-rapoport/comment-page-1/#comment-30 CT Lawyer Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:38:38 +0000 http://www.dailyructions.com/?p=56#comment-30 Her logic is unbearably flawed. She attacks the allegations that she is not engaged in the practice of law by making the rather humorous leap that if she is not engaged in the practice of law, then no government or corporate attorneys are engaged in the practice of law. Huh? Only problem is that no one is alleging that government or corporate attorneys are not engaged in the practice of law. The only allegation is that acting as Secretary of State (not any government attorney) is not engaging in the practice of law. The fact that she would engage in such an obviously flawed analysis leads me to two possible conclusions: 1) she doesn't understand the issue; or 2) she understands the issue and is trying to hide it behind flawed legal analysis. Either option is bad. Only real question a voter needs to ask; is this the quality legal analysis we can expect from her if elected the State's lawyer. Her logic is unbearably flawed. She attacks the allegations that she is not engaged in the practice of law by making the rather humorous leap that if she is not engaged in the practice of law, then no government or corporate attorneys are engaged in the practice of law.

Huh?

Only problem is that no one is alleging that government or corporate attorneys are not engaged in the practice of law. The only allegation is that acting as Secretary of State (not any government attorney) is not engaging in the practice of law. The fact that she would engage in such an obviously flawed analysis leads me to two possible conclusions: 1) she doesn’t understand the issue; or 2) she understands the issue and is trying to hide it behind flawed legal analysis. Either option is bad.

Only real question a voter needs to ask; is this the quality legal analysis we can expect from her if elected the State’s lawyer.

]]>